[NYCNightOwl]

Some guys use normal Asian dating apps, others try old-school “Asian bride” websites. Very different vibe and risk level. If you’ve tried both, which worked better for you and why?

31

[NashvilleTom]

I tried one of those “bride” style sites once and bailed fast. Everything was pay per letter and felt like a scripted chat. Normal apps like Tantan and Tinder felt way more organic.

24

[BostonReader]

The problem with “mail order bride” sites is incentives. They make money when you keep chatting, not when you actually meet. Apps win for me because they’re built around matches and real life meetups.

14

[JerseyCommuter]

Apps can still suck, but at least you’re not paying per message. I’d rather deal with some swipes and ghosting than feel like I’m talking to a call center on the other end.

27

[SmallTownBen]

One friend met his wife through an agency, but he dropped thousands on tours and translators. I met my girlfriend through a regular app while traveling. I’ll take the cheaper route personally.

26

[IowaFarmKid]

The ‘mail order bride’ framing is outdated and honestly insulting to the women too. The serious platforms now are basically just international dating sites with better profiles. The real question is whether you’re using something that attracts women who want a genuine relationship vs women who just want out of their country. Those are very different pools.

17

[PhillySkater]

I’ve used both kinds. The old-school agency model with paid letters felt transactional from minute one — and it was, for everyone involved. Modern apps feel more natural because women reach out too, conversation flows both ways, and you’re not paying per message. But you still have to visit. That never changes.

24

[Author]

Posts